Estimate your calorie needs based on lean mass with the Calorie / TDEE Calculator (Katch-McArdle formula).
Your Recent & Past Results
Restored a past calculation.
Compare Calculations
Side-by-Side Comparison
A comparison of your calculations' results.
Downloads
Includes your inputs and results for this calculation, plus any additional calculations you've compared.
Share & Print
The link includes your inputs and results, so anyone who opens it sees this exact calculation.
Good to Know
These formulas estimate lean mass from height and weight alone — they can be less accurate for very muscular or very high-body-fat individuals, since the underlying study populations were mostly average body compositions. A direct measurement (see the Body Fat Percentage Calculator) will generally be more accurate for your specific body.
Disclaimer
This calculator provides estimates for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, medical, legal, or tax advice. Always consult a qualified professional about your specific situation.
Estimating Lean Mass from Height, Weight, and Gender
Lean body mass is your total body weight minus fat mass — everything else, including muscle,
bone, organs, and water. Enter your gender at birth, height, and weight, and this calculator
shows the estimate from three different published formulas side by side — plus their average —
since no single formula is more “correct” than the others.
The Formulas
Every formula below uses the same two inputs — weight (kg) and height (cm) — with
different coefficients for men and women, so the same two colors track the same two quantities
across all three:
Boer (1984) — derived from a large study population and the most widely cited of the three
today:
Average: (61.4+62.7+57.8)÷3=60.6 kg — about 75.8% of total body weight.
Key Factors to Consider
Lean body mass and fat-free mass are nearly, but not always, treated as identical terms.
Some sources define lean body mass as including a small amount of essential fat (found in bone
marrow, organs, and the nervous system) while “fat-free mass” excludes essential fat entirely —
in practice the two terms are frequently used interchangeably, and these population-based
formulas estimate the same general quantity either way.
These formulas were derived from average-body-composition study populations, which is exactly
why muscular or very lean individuals see more disagreement between them. A bodybuilder with
unusually high muscle mass, or someone with unusually low body fat, falls outside the range these
regression formulas were built from — the spread between the three results tends to widen for
anyone whose body composition differs substantially from an average adult.
Lean body mass is a useful reference point for setting protein intake targets. Many
evidence-based protein recommendations for muscle building or maintenance are expressed per
pound or kilogram of lean body mass rather than total body weight, since lean tissue — not fat
— is what actually uses dietary protein for repair and growth.
None of these formulas can distinguish muscle from other lean tissue. “Lean body mass”
lumps together muscle, bone, organs, and water — two people with the identical lean mass figure
could have very different amounts of actual muscle, which this calculator alone can’t reveal.
Common Mistakes
Treating one formula’s result as the single “correct” answer. All three formulas are
legitimate published estimates with no formula proven more accurate than the others — the
spread between them, not any one number, is the honest picture.
Applying these formulas to a body type far outside the original study populations.
Bodybuilders, very lean athletes, and others with atypical body composition will see wider
disagreement between the three formulas, since none were derived from populations like theirs.
Confusing lean body mass with muscle mass. Lean body mass includes bone, organs, and water
alongside muscle — a higher lean mass figure doesn’t necessarily mean more muscle specifically.
Setting protein or calorie targets from a rough formula estimate instead of a direct
measurement when precision actually matters. For general reference this estimate is fine, but
someone tracking body composition closely should weigh it against an actual measurement like the
Body Fat Percentage Calculator’s circumference method.
Useful to Know
Want a body-fat-percentage-based estimate instead of a formula based purely on height and
weight? The Body Fat Percentage Calculator calculator uses circumference measurements for a more
individualized number.
Setting a protein intake target based on your lean mass? The Protein Intake Calculator
calculator translates a lean-mass figure into a daily protein target.
Curious how your lean mass estimate stacks up against a healthy weight range for your height?
The Ideal Weight Calculator calculator covers that separate question.
Estimar la Masa Magra a Partir de la Estatura, el Peso y el Género
La masa corporal magra es tu peso corporal total menos la masa grasa — todo lo demás, incluyendo
músculo, hueso, órganos y agua. Ingresa tu género al nacer, tu estatura y tu peso, y esta
calculadora muestra la estimación de tres fórmulas publicadas diferentes lado a lado — además de
su promedio — ya que ninguna fórmula individual es más “correcta” que las demás.
Las fórmulas
Cada fórmula a continuación usa las mismas dos variables de entrada — peso (kg) y estatura
(cm) — con coeficientes distintos para hombres y mujeres, de modo que los mismos dos colores
identifican las mismas dos cantidades en las tres fórmulas:
Boer (1984) — derivada de una población de estudio numerosa y la más citada de las tres en la
actualidad:
Promedio: (61.4+62.7+57.8)÷3=60.6 kg — aproximadamente el 75.8% del peso
corporal total.
Factores Clave a Considerar
La masa corporal magra y la masa libre de grasa se tratan casi, pero no siempre, como términos
idénticos. Algunas fuentes definen la masa corporal magra como incluyendo una pequeña cantidad
de grasa esencial (encontrada en la médula ósea, los órganos y el sistema nervioso) mientras que
“masa libre de grasa” excluye la grasa esencial por completo — en la práctica ambos términos se
usan frecuentemente de forma intercambiable, y estas fórmulas basadas en poblaciones estiman la
misma cantidad general de cualquier forma.
Estas fórmulas se derivaron de poblaciones de estudio con composición corporal promedio, que es
exactamente la razón por la que las personas musculosas o muy delgadas ven más desacuerdo entre
ellas. Un fisicoculturista con masa muscular inusualmente alta, o alguien con grasa corporal
inusualmente baja, cae fuera del rango del cual se construyeron estas fórmulas de regresión — la
dispersión entre los tres resultados tiende a ampliarse para cualquiera cuya composición corporal
difiera sustancialmente de un adulto promedio.
La masa corporal magra es un punto de referencia útil para establecer objetivos de ingesta de
proteína. Muchas recomendaciones de proteína basadas en evidencia para la construcción o
mantenimiento muscular se expresan por libra o kilogramo de masa corporal magra en lugar de peso
corporal total, ya que el tejido magro — no la grasa — es lo que realmente usa la proteína
dietética para la reparación y el crecimiento.
Ninguna de estas fórmulas puede distinguir el músculo de otro tejido magro. La “masa corporal
magra” agrupa músculo, hueso, órganos y agua — dos personas con la misma cifra de masa magra
podrían tener cantidades muy distintas de músculo real, algo que esta calculadora por sí sola no
puede revelar.
Errores Comunes
Tratar el resultado de una fórmula como la única respuesta “correcta”. Las tres fórmulas son
estimaciones publicadas legítimas y ninguna ha demostrado ser más precisa que las demás — la
dispersión entre ellas, no una sola cifra, es el panorama honesto.
Aplicar estas fórmulas a un tipo de cuerpo muy alejado de las poblaciones de estudio
originales. Los fisicoculturistas, atletas muy delgados y otras personas con composición
corporal atípica verán mayor desacuerdo entre las tres fórmulas, ya que ninguna se derivó de
poblaciones como la suya.
Confundir la masa corporal magra con la masa muscular. La masa corporal magra incluye
hueso, órganos y agua además del músculo — una cifra de masa magra más alta no significa
necesariamente más músculo específicamente.
Fijar objetivos de proteína o calorías a partir de una estimación aproximada de fórmula en
lugar de una medición directa cuando la precisión realmente importa. Para referencia general
esta estimación está bien, pero alguien que sigue de cerca su composición corporal debería
contrastarla con una medición real como el método de circunferencias de la Calculadora de
Porcentaje de Grasa Corporal.
Útil Saber
¿Quieres una estimación basada en el porcentaje de grasa corporal en lugar de una fórmula basada
puramente en estatura y peso? La Calculadora de Porcentaje de Grasa Corporal usa medidas de circunferencia para
una cifra más individualizada.
¿Estás fijando un objetivo de ingesta de proteína según tu masa magra? La
Calculadora de Ingesta de Proteína traduce una cifra de masa magra en un objetivo diario
de proteína.
¿Tienes curiosidad por saber cómo se compara tu estimación de masa magra con un rango de peso
saludable para tu estatura? La Calculadora de Peso Ideal cubre esa pregunta por separado.
Lean body mass is your total body weight minus fat mass — it includes muscle, bone, organs, and water. It's the complement of body fat percentage: if you know your body fat percentage and total weight, lean mass is simply the rest.
Which formula should I use?
None of the three is definitively the most accurate — they were published independently between 1966 and 1984 using different study populations. This calculator shows all three plus their average specifically so you see the real spread rather than one number presented as more authoritative than it is.
How is this different from the Body Fat Percentage Calculator?
Body Fat Percentage uses circumference measurements (the U.S. Navy method) to estimate fat mass directly. This calculator instead estimates LEAN mass from height, weight, and gender using population-based formulas, with no measurements beyond height and weight needed. The two use different inputs and different methods, so they won't always agree exactly.
Is lean body mass the same as muscle mass?
No — lean body mass includes muscle, but also bone, organs, and water. It's a broader category than muscle mass alone, so two people with the same lean body mass figure could still have meaningfully different amounts of actual muscle.
Why do the three formulas give different results?
Each formula was derived from a different study population using regression analysis, so they weight height and weight slightly differently. The spread between them is usually small for an average body composition, but can widen for very muscular or very lean individuals whose bodies differ more from the original study populations.
We use cookies for analytics and ads to help support this free site. You can accept all, or decline and we'll only use what's needed for the site to work.