Ideal Weight Calculator

Height

Average Ideal Weight

72.3 kg

By Formula

  • Devine: 73 kg
  • Robinson: 71 kg
  • Miller: 70.3 kg
  • Hamwi: 75 kg

Analysis

  • These four formulas were each published decades apart from different research groups, so some spread between them is expected — none is more "correct" than the others.

Recommendations

Compare Calculations

Downloads

Includes your inputs and results for this calculation, plus any additional calculations you've compared.

Good to Know

These formulas estimate a population-average reference weight from height alone — they don't account for muscle mass, bone density, frame size, or body composition, so a muscular or large-framed person may weigh more than their "ideal weight" while being perfectly healthy. Treat this as a rough reference point, not a personal target.

Disclaimer

This calculator provides estimates for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, medical, legal, or tax advice. Always consult a qualified professional about your specific situation.

How This Calculator Works

An “ideal weight” formula estimates a reference body weight from height and gender, using a linear relationship first published decades ago for clinical use. Enter your gender at birth and height, and this calculator shows the result from four different published formulas side by side — plus their average — since no single formula is more “correct” than the others.

Showing all four is deliberate: each was developed independently by a different research group at a different time, and they don’t agree exactly. Presenting just one as a single definitive number would overstate how precise this kind of estimate actually is.

The Formula

Every formula below shares the same shape: a base weight at exactly 5 feet (60 inches) tall, plus a fixed rate for every inch above or below that — so the same one color tracks the same one variable (inches over 5 ft) across all four:

Devine (1974), Men=50.0+2.30×Inches Over 5 Ft kg\vB{\text{Devine (1974), Men}} = 50.0 + 2.30 \times \vA{\text{Inches Over 5 Ft}} \text{ kg} Devine (1974), Women=45.5+2.30×Inches Over 5 Ft kg\vB{\text{Devine (1974), Women}} = 45.5 + 2.30 \times \vA{\text{Inches Over 5 Ft}} \text{ kg} Robinson (1983), Men=52.0+1.90×Inches Over 5 Ft kg\vC{\text{Robinson (1983), Men}} = 52.0 + 1.90 \times \vA{\text{Inches Over 5 Ft}} \text{ kg} Robinson (1983), Women=49.0+1.70×Inches Over 5 Ft kg\vC{\text{Robinson (1983), Women}} = 49.0 + 1.70 \times \vA{\text{Inches Over 5 Ft}} \text{ kg} Miller (1983), Men=56.2+1.41×Inches Over 5 Ft kg\vD{\text{Miller (1983), Men}} = 56.2 + 1.41 \times \vA{\text{Inches Over 5 Ft}} \text{ kg} Miller (1983), Women=53.1+1.36×Inches Over 5 Ft kg\vD{\text{Miller (1983), Women}} = 53.1 + 1.36 \times \vA{\text{Inches Over 5 Ft}} \text{ kg} Hamwi (1964), Men=48.0+2.70×Inches Over 5 Ft kg\vE{\text{Hamwi (1964), Men}} = 48.0 + 2.70 \times \vA{\text{Inches Over 5 Ft}} \text{ kg} Hamwi (1964), Women=45.5+2.20×Inches Over 5 Ft kg\vE{\text{Hamwi (1964), Women}} = 45.5 + 2.20 \times \vA{\text{Inches Over 5 Ft}} \text{ kg}

The Devine formula was originally created for drug-dosing calculations, not general wellness, but is the most widely cited of the four today. Robinson and Miller are both later independent revisions of Devine using updated population data; Hamwi is the oldest, originally a quick bedside estimate for nutrition planning. This calculator’s headline number is the plain average of all four.

Worked Example

A man who is 5’10” (177.8 cm) tall — 10 inches over the 5-foot base:

  1. Devine: 50+2.3×10=73 kg50 + 2.3 \times \vA{10} = \vB{73} \text{ kg}
  2. Robinson: 52+1.9×10=71 kg52 + 1.9 \times \vA{10} = \vC{71} \text{ kg}
  3. Miller: 56.2+1.41×10=70.3 kg56.2 + 1.41 \times \vA{10} = \vD{70.3} \text{ kg}
  4. Hamwi: 48+2.7×10=75 kg48 + 2.7 \times \vA{10} = \vE{75} \text{ kg}
  5. Average: (73+71+70.3+75)÷4=72.325 kg(\vB{73} + \vC{71} + \vD{70.3} + \vE{75}) \div 4 = 72.325 \text{ kg} (about 159.5 lb).

Source: Devine, Robinson, Miller & Hamwi Formulas.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which formula is the most accurate?

None of the four is definitively "correct" — they're independent estimates published by different research groups between 1964 and 1983, and they don't always agree. This calculator shows all four plus their average specifically so you see the real spread rather than one number presented as more authoritative than it is.

Why does this differ from my BMI-based healthy weight range?

BMI and these ideal-weight formulas use different math (BMI is weight divided by height squared; these formulas are height-only linear estimates), so they can give noticeably different numbers. Neither accounts for muscle mass or frame size, which is exactly why this calculator's limitations note exists — use both as rough references, not precise targets.

Do these formulas work for very short or very tall people?

They're linear extrapolations from a 5-foot (60-inch) base height, so they still produce a number for any height, but they were derived from adult populations near an average height range. The further your height is from that range, the less reliable the estimate becomes.