These four formulas were each published decades apart from different research groups, so some spread between them is expected — none is more "correct" than the others.
Includes your inputs and results for this calculation, plus any additional calculations you've compared.
Share & Print
The link includes your inputs and results, so anyone who opens it sees this exact calculation.
Good to Know
These formulas estimate a population-average reference weight from height alone — they don't account for muscle mass, bone density, frame size, or body composition, so a muscular or large-framed person may weigh more than their "ideal weight" while being perfectly healthy. Treat this as a rough reference point, not a personal target.
Disclaimer
This calculator provides estimates for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, medical, legal, or tax advice. Always consult a qualified professional about your specific situation.
How This Calculator Works
An “ideal weight” formula estimates a reference body weight from height and gender, using a linear
relationship first published decades ago for clinical use. Enter your gender at birth and
height, and this calculator shows the result from four different published formulas side by side
— plus their average — since no single formula is more “correct” than the others.
Showing all four is deliberate: each was developed independently by a different research group at
a different time, and they don’t agree exactly. Presenting just one as a single definitive number
would overstate how precise this kind of estimate actually is.
The Formula
Every formula below shares the same shape: a base weight at exactly 5 feet (60 inches) tall, plus
a fixed rate for every inch above or below that — so the same one color tracks the same one
variable (inches over 5 ft) across all four:
Devine (1974), Men=50.0+2.30×Inches Over 5 Ft kgDevine (1974), Women=45.5+2.30×Inches Over 5 Ft kgRobinson (1983), Men=52.0+1.90×Inches Over 5 Ft kgRobinson (1983), Women=49.0+1.70×Inches Over 5 Ft kgMiller (1983), Men=56.2+1.41×Inches Over 5 Ft kgMiller (1983), Women=53.1+1.36×Inches Over 5 Ft kgHamwi (1964), Men=48.0+2.70×Inches Over 5 Ft kgHamwi (1964), Women=45.5+2.20×Inches Over 5 Ft kg
The Devine formula was originally created for drug-dosing calculations, not general wellness, but
is the most widely cited of the four today. Robinson and Miller are both later independent
revisions of Devine using updated population data; Hamwi is the oldest, originally a quick bedside
estimate for nutrition planning. This calculator’s headline number is the plain average of all
four.
Worked Example
A man who is 5’10” (177.8 cm) tall — 10 inches over the 5-foot base:
Devine: 50+2.3×10=73 kg
Robinson: 52+1.9×10=71 kg
Miller: 56.2+1.41×10=70.3 kg
Hamwi: 48+2.7×10=75 kg
Average: (73+71+70.3+75)÷4=72.325 kg (about 159.5 lb).
Cómo funciona esta calculadora
Una fórmula de “peso ideal” estima un peso corporal de referencia a partir de la estatura y el
género, usando una relación lineal publicada por primera vez hace décadas para uso clínico. Ingresa
tu género al nacer y tu estatura, y esta calculadora muestra el resultado de cuatro fórmulas
publicadas distintas, una junto a la otra — además de su promedio — ya que ninguna fórmula es más
“correcta” que las demás.
Mostrar las cuatro es deliberado: cada una fue desarrollada de forma independiente por un grupo de
investigación distinto en una época distinta, y no coinciden exactamente entre sí. Presentar solo
una como un único número definitivo exageraría qué tan precisa es realmente este tipo de
estimación.
La fórmula
Cada fórmula a continuación comparte la misma forma: un peso base a exactamente 5 pies (60
pulgadas) de estatura, más una tasa fija por cada pulgada por encima o por debajo de eso — así que
un mismo color rastrea una misma variable (pulgadas por encima de 5 pies) en las cuatro:
Devine (1974), Hombres=50.0+2.30×Pulgadas sobre 5 pies kgDevine (1974), Mujeres=45.5+2.30×Pulgadas sobre 5 pies kgRobinson (1983), Hombres=52.0+1.90×Pulgadas sobre 5 pies kgRobinson (1983), Mujeres=49.0+1.70×Pulgadas sobre 5 pies kgMiller (1983), Hombres=56.2+1.41×Pulgadas sobre 5 pies kgMiller (1983), Mujeres=53.1+1.36×Pulgadas sobre 5 pies kgHamwi (1964), Hombres=48.0+2.70×Pulgadas sobre 5 pies kgHamwi (1964), Mujeres=45.5+2.20×Pulgadas sobre 5 pies kg
La fórmula de Devine se creó originalmente para cálculos de dosificación de medicamentos, no para
el bienestar general, pero es la más citada de las cuatro hoy en día. Robinson y Miller son ambas
revisiones independientes posteriores de Devine usando datos poblacionales actualizados; Hamwi es
la más antigua, originalmente una estimación rápida de cabecera para la planificación nutricional.
El número principal de esta calculadora es el promedio simple de las cuatro.
Ejemplo resuelto
Un hombre que mide 5’10” (177.8 cm) de estatura — 10 pulgadas por encima de la base de 5 pies:
Devine: 50+2.3×10=73 kg
Robinson: 52+1.9×10=71 kg
Miller: 56.2+1.41×10=70.3 kg
Hamwi: 48+2.7×10=75 kg
Promedio: (73+71+70.3+75)÷4=72.325 kg (aproximadamente 159.5 lb).
None of the four is definitively "correct" — they're independent estimates published by different research groups between 1964 and 1983, and they don't always agree. This calculator shows all four plus their average specifically so you see the real spread rather than one number presented as more authoritative than it is.
Why does this differ from my BMI-based healthy weight range?
BMI and these ideal-weight formulas use different math (BMI is weight divided by height squared; these formulas are height-only linear estimates), so they can give noticeably different numbers. Neither accounts for muscle mass or frame size, which is exactly why this calculator's limitations note exists — use both as rough references, not precise targets.
Do these formulas work for very short or very tall people?
They're linear extrapolations from a 5-foot (60-inch) base height, so they still produce a number for any height, but they were derived from adult populations near an average height range. The further your height is from that range, the less reliable the estimate becomes.
We use cookies for analytics and ads to help support this free site. You can accept all, or decline and we'll only use what's needed for the site to work.